Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:43:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:43:48 -0500 Received: from 60.54.252.64.snet.net ([64.252.54.60]:18406 "EHLO hotmale.blue-labs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:43:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3E536237.8010502@blue-labs.org> Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 05:53:43 -0500 From: David Ford User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030209 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.62 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1141 Lines: 30 2.5.60+ is rather unstable for me on an Athlon CPU w/ gcc 3.2.2. If I'm careful and do very little in X, it seems to stay up for a few days. If I do any sort of fast graphics or sound, etc, it'll die very quickly. 'tis an instant death with no OOPS, nothing at all on screen, nothing on serial console. Just an FYI, I'm trying to narrow it down. David Linus Torvalds wrote: >Hmm.. Mostly lots of small updates, although the merge with Andrew >included the RCU dcache patches from IBM that he has carried along for a >while (ie fairly fundamnetal, but also very well tested). > >ARM, PPC, PPC64, alpha, kbuild. > >Oh, and as a sign that 2.6.x really _is_ approaching, people have started >sending me spelling fixes. Kernel coders are apparently all atrocious >spellers, and for some reason the spelling police always comes out of the >woodwork when stable releases get closer. > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/