Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:39:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:39:43 -0500 Received: from ip68-13-105-80.om.om.cox.net ([68.13.105.80]:10886 "EHLO localhost.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:39:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:49:57 -0600 (CST) From: Thomas Molina X-X-Sender: tmolina@localhost.localdomain To: David Ford cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.62 In-Reply-To: <3E536237.8010502@blue-labs.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 873 Lines: 20 On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, David Ford wrote: > 2.5.60+ is rather unstable for me on an Athlon CPU w/ gcc 3.2.2. If I'm > careful and do very little in X, it seems to stay up for a few days. If > I do any sort of fast graphics or sound, etc, it'll die very quickly. > 'tis an instant death with no OOPS, nothing at all on screen, nothing on > serial console. 2.5.60 is where it started getting the most stable for me with similar equipment. My system is Athlon 1.3 GHz, ASUS A7V, RedHat 8.0, Yamaha 754 soundcard. I'm not burning any DVDs, but I am making a few CDs, lots of kernel compiles, playing with modules, etc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/