Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S268557AbTBSN0A>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:26:00 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S268558AbTBSN0A>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:26:00 -0500
Received: from tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.183]:27597 "EHLO
	tomts21-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S268557AbTBSNZ7>; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:25:59 -0500
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 08:33:15 -0500 (EST)
From: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
X-X-Sender: rpjday@dell
To: Helge Hafting <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
cc: Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: a really annoying feature of the config menu structure
In-Reply-To: <3E538479.1040305@aitel.hist.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0302190832060.29022-100000@dell>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 698
Lines: 20

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Helge Hafting wrote:

> There is no config layout that is "clean" for everybody,
> because it is fundamentally trying to stuff a generic graph
> into a hierarchical tree.

and, just to be clear, i never suggested that there is
a single, perfect solution that would make everyone happy.
i *do* contend that the current layout could be improved
immensely, that's all.

the only question is whether it's feasible or worth doing.

rday

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/