Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754411AbbHMXZc (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:25:32 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:36768 "EHLO mail-io0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753767AbbHMXZb (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:25:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <55CCB510.3060807@redhat.com> <55CD0DAC.9080809@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:25:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3yV8a6yV_1E_RmUvpIeGmIRaODg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values wrong in VM? From: Linus Torvalds To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Denys Vlasenko , Kees Cook , David Drysdale , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Will Drewry , Ingo Molnar , Alok Kataria , Borislav Petkov , Alexei Starovoitov , Frederic Weisbecker , "H. Peter Anvin" , Oleg Nesterov , Steven Rostedt , X86 ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 565 Lines: 14 On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > For better for for worse, the native 64-bit path changed several > versions agi, and nothing broke that I'm aware of. Ok, I'll take that as an ACK for the patch, and apply it, since it seems to fix this regression. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/