Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:19:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:19:48 -0500 Received: from mrelay1.cc.umr.edu ([131.151.1.120]:7065 "EHLO smtp.umr.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 11:19:35 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Subject: 2.4.20 amd speculative caching Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:28:41 -0600 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 2.4.20 amd speculative caching Thread-Index: AcLYM/YPfVqwUCCtSvuXTRcXKqgNdA== From: "Sowadski, Craig Harold (UMR-Student)" To: Cc: "Sowadski, Craig Harold (UMR-Student)" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 825 Lines: 16 I have recently upgraded to an AMD processor that is exhibiting the problems with the AMD speculative caching bug. Kernel 2.4.19 seems to fix the problem with the temporary work-around (adv-spec-cache patch). I have noticed that the patch has been removed from 2.4.20 and I am wondering if there is some other mechanism that is supposed to address this issue. Currently I have a 2.4.20 kernel with same configuration as my 2.4.19 and the problem seems to have reappeared. Thanks for any information. (please CC my address on reply) Craig Sowadski (sowadski@umr.edu) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/