Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752015AbbHNTUg (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:20:36 -0400 Received: from smtp-1b.atlantis.sk ([80.94.52.26]:49568 "EHLO smtp-1b.atlantis.sk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751004AbbHNTUe (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:20:34 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 381 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 14 Aug 2015 15:20:34 EDT From: Ondrej Zary To: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: staging: ft1000-pcmcia: remove support for v5 firmware Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 21:14:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 (enterprise35 0.20100827.1168748) Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Kernel development list References: <20150814085017.GA30728@mwanda> In-Reply-To: <20150814085017.GA30728@mwanda> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201508142114.06209.linux@rainbow-software.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4065 Lines: 86 On Friday 14 August 2015 10:50:17 Dan Carpenter wrote: > Hello Ondrej Zary, > > The patch e161a440af56: "staging: ft1000-pcmcia: remove support for > v5 firmware" from Jul 1, 2011, leads to the following static checker > warning: > > drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000_dnld.c:513 card_download() > warn: condition implies we already warned. > > drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-pcmcia/ft1000_dnld.c > 319 file_version = *(long *)pFileStart; > 320 if (file_version != 6) { > > We only support version 6 now. > > 321 pr_err("unsupported firmware version %ld\n", > file_version); 322 Status = FAILURE; > 323 } > 324 > > [ snip ] > > 513 if (file_version == 5) { > > I think we can just delete this side of the if statement? > > 514 /* > 515 * Position ASIC > DPRAM auto-increment pointer. 516 > */ > 517 > ft1000_write_reg(dev, 518 > FT1000_REG_DPRAM_ADDR, 519 > DWNLD_PS_HDR_LOC); 520 > 521 for (; word_length > > 0; word_length--) { /* In words */ 522 > temp = ntohs(*pUsData); 523 > ft1000_write_reg(dev, 524 > > FT1000_REG_DPRAM_DATA, 525 > temp); 526 > pUsData++; 527 > } > 528 } else { > 529 /* > 530 * Position ASIC > DPRAM auto-increment pointer. 531 > */ > 532 > outw(DWNLD_MAG_PS_HDR_LOC, 533 > dev->base_addr + 534 > FT1000_REG_DPRAM_ADDR); 535 > if (word_length & 0x01) 536 > word_length++; 537 > 538 word_length = > word_length / 2; 539 > 540 for (; word_length > > 0; word_length--) { /* In words */ 541 > templong = *pUsData++; 542 > templong |= 543 > (*pUsData++ << 16); 544 > outl(templong, 545 > dev->base_addr + 546 > > FT1000_REG_MAG_DPDATAL); 547 > } > 548 } > > regards, > dan carpenter Most probably yes. However, the driver will be useless soon as the Flash OFDM network is being decommissioned here in Slovakia. AFAIK, this technology is not used anywhere else in the world (the 2nd country was Finland). The ft1000 devices will be left with no signal. -- Ondrej Zary -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/