Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753734AbbHOUXF (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Aug 2015 16:23:05 -0400 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:48177 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751332AbbHOUXC (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Aug 2015 16:23:02 -0400 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2015 22:22:32 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Dustin Byford , Mika Westerberg Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/1] i2c: acpi: scan ACPI enumerated I2C mux channels Message-ID: <20150815202229.GA3463@katana> References: <1439510358-16664-1-git-send-email-dustin@cumulusnetworks.com> <1439580693-5538-1-git-send-email-dustin@cumulusnetworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1439580693-5538-1-git-send-email-dustin@cumulusnetworks.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2364 Lines: 84 On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:31:32PM -0700, Dustin Byford wrote: > > (v2 corrects cc: list) And adding Mika to the cc-list who is our I2C and ACPI expert. Mika can you have a look at this and the other patches Dustin sent recently to the i2c list? Thanks, Wolfram > > I would like to add support for scanning I2C devices connected to ACPI > OF compatible muxes described in ASL like this: > > Device (MUX0) > { > Name (_ADR, 0x70) > Name (_HID, "PRP0001") > Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate() > { > I2cSerialBus (0x70, ControllerInitiated, I2C_SPEED, > AddressingMode7Bit, "^^SMB2", 0x00, > ResourceConsumer,,) > }) > Name (_DSD, Package () > { > ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), > Package () { > Package (2) { "compatible", "nxp,pca9548" }, > } > }) > > // MUX channels > Device (CH00) { Name (_ADR, 0x0) } > } > > Scope(MUX0.CH00) > { > Device (TMP0) { > /* Temp sensor ASL, for example. */ > } > } > > It seems like a reasonable way to describe a common I2C component and > kernel support is almost there. > > I had to: > > 1) Find and set an ACPI companion for the "virtual" I2C adapters created > for each mux channel. > > 2) Make sure to scan adap.dev when registering devices under each mux > channel. > > At first, I was confused about why adap.dev->parent is used in > acpi_i2c_register_devices(). I found b34bb1ee from 4/2013 (ACPI / I2C: > Use parent's ACPI_HANDLE()), which offers an explanation. > > This patch works well, but I'm not sure about the code to just fall back > to using adap.dev when adap.dev->parent doesn't have an ACPI companion. > Is there a more explicit check I can make to determine if the adapter > represents a mux channel? > > Any feedback would be welcome. Thanks, > > --Dustin > > Dustin Byford (1): > i2c: acpi: scan ACPI enumerated I2C mux channels > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 10 ++++++++++ > drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c | 8 ++++++++ > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+) > > -- > 2.1.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/