Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:31:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:31:39 -0500 Received: from tapu.f00f.org ([202.49.232.129]:26256 "EHLO tapu.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:31:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:41:42 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Richard Henderson , rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] eliminate warnings in generated module files Message-ID: <20030219234142.GB22254@f00f.org> References: <20030218194351.A23525@twiddle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 836 Lines: 23 On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 09:16:35PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Some people are still using 2.95, I think anything past that is long > since unsupported and not worth worrying about. I've recently started using 3.2 for testing and it seems, thus far, so worse than 2.95.x and appears to have fewer bugs in some regards (i.e. don't seem to go bonkers with register pressure form long long). At some point, 2.95.x might be considered too old and gcc 3.2+ with have to be the minimum --- is this time near? What about MIPS and Sparc64 --- are they still using ancient compilers? --cw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/