Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752448AbbHQRbt (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:31:49 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:46600 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbbHQRbq (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Aug 2015 13:31:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 20:31:52 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl?= Beamonte Cc: Johnny Kim , Rachel Kim , Dean Lee , Chris Park , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] staging: wilc1000: replace MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER() macro to avoid possible memory leak Message-ID: <20150817173152.GC5610@mwanda> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Source-IP: aserv0021.oracle.com [141.146.126.233] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2934 Lines: 84 On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:08:35PM -0400, Rapha?l Beamonte wrote: > The MACRO_WILC_BUFFER() macro was using a return statement, and didn't > take care of possible memory leaks and subsequent bugs when it was failing > after succeeding some allocations. This patch corrects this behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Rapha?l Beamonte > --- > drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_exported_buf.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_exported_buf.c b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_exported_buf.c > index bf392fb..c3aff9a 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_exported_buf.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/wilc1000/wilc_exported_buf.c > @@ -8,13 +8,6 @@ > #define LINUX_TX_SIZE (64 * 1024) > #define WILC1000_FW_SIZE (4 * 1024) > > -#define MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER(name, size) \ > - exported_ ## name = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); \ > - if (!exported_ ## name) { \ > - printk("fail to alloc: %s memory\n", exported_ ## name); \ > - return -ENOBUFS; \ > - } > - > /* > * Add necessary buffer pointers > */ > @@ -40,17 +33,43 @@ void *get_fw_buffer(void) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_fw_buffer); > > +static inline int kmalloc_wilc_buffer(void *buf, int size) > +{ > + buf = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!buf) { > + printk("fail to alloc memory\n"); > + return -ENOBUFS; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > static int __init wilc_module_init(void) > { > printk("wilc_module_init\n"); > /* > * alloc necessary memory > */ > - MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER(g_tx_buf, LINUX_TX_SIZE) > - MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER(g_rx_buf, LINUX_RX_SIZE) > - MALLOC_WILC_BUFFER(g_fw_buf, WILC1000_FW_SIZE) > + if (kmalloc_wilc_buffer(exported_g_tx_buf, LINUX_TX_SIZE)) > + goto error_g_tx_buf; Don't do it this way. Just do: exported_g_tx_buf = kmalloc(LINUX_TX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!exported_g_tx_buf) return -ENOMEM; exported_g_rx_buf = kmalloc(LINUX_TX_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!exported_g_rx_buf) goto free_tx_buf; 1) Avoid abstraction where possible. 2) The error code should be -ENOMEM 3) This is not a universal rule, but I feel it's better to return directly instead of using a do-nothing-goto. Some people think using gotos everywhere forces you to think about error handling so it is worth making the code slightly less readable. Based on my static analysis results, I do not believe that it makes people think about error handling. 4) Name the label after the where the label is (what it does on the next line) instead of basing it on the goto location. 5) Preserve the error codes. Use ret = kmalloc_wilc_buffer(); if (ret). regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/