Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 04:10:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 04:10:41 -0500 Received: from newpeace.netnation.com ([204.174.223.7]:40616 "EHLO peace.netnation.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 04:10:39 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 01:20:43 -0800 From: Simon Kirby To: Andi Kleen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com Subject: Re: Longstanding networking / SMP issue? (duplextest) Message-ID: <20030220092043.GA25527@netnation.com> References: <20030219174757.GA5373@netnation.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 961 Lines: 24 On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 08:52:46AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > That's probably because of the lazy ICMP socket locking used for the > ICMP socket. When an ICMP is already in process the next ICMP triggered > from a softirq (e.g. ECHO-REQUEST) is dropped > (see net/ipv4/icmp_xmit_lock_bh()) Hmm...and this is considered desired behavior? It seems like an odd way of handling packets intended to test latency and reliability. :) This is most likely the cause, but I will test tomorrow to confirm. Thanks, Simon- [ Simon Kirby ][ Network Operations ] [ sim@netnation.com ][ NetNation Communications ] [ Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of my employer. ] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/