Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:14:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:14:00 -0500 Received: from cal003100.student.utwente.nl ([130.89.160.36]:31686 "EHLO margo.student.utwente.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:13:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:24:04 +0100 To: Kernel Maillist Subject: 2.4.x release process comments Message-ID: <20030220102404.GA10138@margo.student.utwente.nl> Mail-Followup-To: simon, Kernel Maillist Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Simon Oosthoek Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2181 Lines: 50 Hi all I'm a little worried about the support for the 2.4.x kernel series. In the past few releases I've noticed a couple of things that I think are bad for the kernel. - Kernel version releases (and -pre releases) do not happen often enough to keep up with recent hardware Maybe it's the contrast with the speed of releases on the 2.5.x series, but while I understand the need for stability on the 2.4.x series, bugfixes and hardware support should be kept up to date in the stable series as well. Distributions need this, since every 6 months a new release is made (mandrake, redhat, suse). If it is not kept up to date, the distros start using 2.4.x-pre series to provide support for the most recent hardware on which the new distros are going to be installed. I'd love to see regular (say once a week) releases -preX releases and no more than 10 -pre releases before a -rc. No more than 4 -rc's (released no more than 2 weeks apart) before a new version. Faster full version releases would also be fine with me. - Marcello doesn't participate (much) on the kernel list Again, not really a problem on its own, I'm sure Marcello has a lot of things to worry about, but somehow it detracts a little from the feeling of "trust" not to see regular posts form the kernel maintainer about bugs, patches and how/why patches are applied/ignored. - Alan Cox seems to provide 90% of the patches to the 2.4.x series Obviously Alan has responsibilities for redhat, so that explains a lot. However I get the feeling that patches for 2.4.x are more and more directed to him rather than Marcello... My personal interest in this is that my laptop is not yet working 100%... (see http://margo.student.utwente.nl/simon/ongoing/jade8060.php) BTW, I've been following the list for at least a year now (mostly via kernel traffic and kernel releases, but now I'm subscribed) Cheers everyone and thanks a lot for the work on the kernel! Simon - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/