Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:44:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:44:31 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:1285 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 05:44:31 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:54:35 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: dada1 Cc: Andi Kleen , Simon Kirby , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org, davem@redhat.com Subject: Re: Longstanding networking / SMP issue? (duplextest) Message-ID: <20030220105435.GD10374@wotan.suse.de> References: <20030219174757.GA5373@netnation.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20030220092043.GA25527@netnation.com> <20030220093422.GA16369@wotan.suse.de> <006301c2d8c8$921c1d10$760010ac@edumazet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <006301c2d8c8$921c1d10$760010ac@edumazet> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 500 Lines: 12 > Yes IP is best-effort. But this argument cant explain why IP on linux works > better if we disable SMP on linux... It has nothing to do with SMP. The lazy locking dropping packets can happen on UP kernels too in extreme cases. Also with preempt. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/