Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752339AbbHSFdS (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:33:18 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:57101 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751370AbbHSFdR (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Aug 2015 01:33:17 -0400 Message-ID: <1439962396.24918.8.camel@ellerman.id.au> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cxl: add set/get private data to context struct From: Michael Ellerman To: Ian Munsie Cc: Matt Ochs , linuxppc-dev , mikey , linux-kernel Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 15:33:16 +1000 In-Reply-To: <1439960447-sup-3936@delenn.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <1439957971-30483-1-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> <1439957971-30483-2-git-send-email-imunsie@au.ibm.com> <1439959770.24918.5.camel@ellerman.id.au> <1439960447-sup-3936@delenn.ozlabs.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1416 Lines: 35 On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 15:12 +1000, Ian Munsie wrote: > Excerpts from Michael Ellerman's message of 2015-08-19 14:49:30 +1000: > > Do we really need the accessors? They don't buy anything I can see over just > > using ctx->priv directly. > > The reasoning there is because we don't currently expose the contents of > stuct cxl_context to afu drivers, rather they just treat it as an opaque > type. > > We could potentially change this to expose the details, but there's a > lot of junk in there that's just internal details of the cxl driver that > isn't of interest to an afu driver that I'd rather not expose. > > We also already have another accessor function (cxl_process_element) in > the api, so it's not out of place. > > FWIW I'm not opposed to changing how this api works if it ultimately > makes things better, but I want to wait until the cxlflash superpipe > support is merged so any patches that change the api can change it at > the same time. OK. I saw struct cxl_context in cxl.h and figured it was public, but it's in drivers/misc/cxl/cxl.h, so yes other drivers have no business poking in there, even though they *could*. So that's fine. cheers -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/