Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751788AbbHTAST (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:18:19 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:32791 "EHLO
	mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751622AbbHTASR (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:18:17 -0400
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:18:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
X-X-Sender: rientjes@chino.kir.corp.google.com
To: "Patil, Kiran" <kiran.patil@intel.com>
cc: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
        Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        "Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
        "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        "Nelson, Shannon" <shannon.nelson@intel.com>,
        "Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@intel.com>,
        "Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>,
        "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.vick@intel.com>,
        "Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
        "Williams, Mitch A" <mitch.a.williams@intel.com>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org" <linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
        "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [Patch V3 5/9] i40e: Use numa_mem_id() to
 better	support memoryless node
In-Reply-To: <4197C471DCF8714FBA1FE32565271C148FFFF4D3@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1508191717450.30666@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <1439781546-7217-1-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <1439781546-7217-6-git-send-email-jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> <4197C471DCF8714FBA1FE32565271C148FFFF4D3@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 468
Lines: 11

On Wed, 19 Aug 2015, Patil, Kiran wrote:

> Acked-by: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@intel.com>

Where's the call to preempt_disable() to prevent kernels with preemption 
from making numa_node_id() invalid during this iteration?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/