Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:41:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:41:50 -0500 Received: from [196.12.44.6] ([196.12.44.6]:26785 "EHLO students.iiit.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:41:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:19:56 +0530 (IST) From: Prasad To: Jeff Garzik cc: lkml Subject: Re: Syscall from Kernel Space In-Reply-To: <20030220174043.GI9800@gtf.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1113 Lines: 28 but what about masking the process. An example is... I want to use the mmap syscall. the kernel implementation uses current->mm, but what i want to do is, the current macro or the get_current() function should give me the task_struct of a process so that the effect of the syscall is seen on that process and not on the current kernel thread. Prasad. On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 11:04:37PM +0530, Prasad wrote: > > Is there a way using which i could invoke a syscall in the kernel > > space? The syscall is to be run disguised as another process. The actual > > Call sys_. Look at the kernel code for examples. > > Note that typically you don't want to do this... and you _really_ don't > want to do this if the syscall is not one of the common file I/O > syscalls (read/write/open/close, etc.) > > Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/