Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:10:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:10:53 -0500 Received: from 251.017.dsl.syd.iprimus.net.au ([210.50.55.251]:58247 "EHLO file1.syd.nuix.com.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:10:46 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Song Zhao Reply-To: song.zhao@nuix.com.au Organization: Nuix Subject: Re: Supermicro X5DL8-GG (ServerWorks Grandchampion LE chipset) slow Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 06:20:21 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200302210620.21799.song.zhao@nuix.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2333 Lines: 57 To: Manish Lachwani On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:54 pm, you wrote: > WHat kind of benchmarks are you running? I had evaluated a Supermicro board > with e7500 chipset and it showed good performance. Are you benchmarking > network, memory, disk? Note that 3ware controllers operate at 33 MHZ PCI > and if the nics share the same PCI bus with 3ware, they too will operate at > 33 MHZ PCI and not 133 MHZ. Have you disabled hyperthreading in the BIOS? I did some disk I/O and CPU benchmarks, including bonnie++, hdparm, nbench, unixbench, dbench, tiotest. I haven't done any network/memory testing yet, the onboard Broadcom and Intel gigabit controllers both seem to work quite well. I have taken care to make sure that the 3ware card has its own PCI bus, in this case slot 5. I have not disabled hyperthreading but I am not sure why I would. On that note, I have also done benchmarking with a Supermicro E7500 board (P4DPR, Intel Gigabit 82544GC onboard controller), the tests I ran included Netperf, Netperf3, NetPIPE (TCP), Tbench, nttcp, Aim9 and the ones I mentioned above. It seemed that if I had two identical machines hooked up directly (back to back with CAT5E crossover cable), the performance would be a lot better and is very consistent. I tried different combinations HT=on/off, CPU affinity, IRQ affinity, SMP/UP. Some results were: Supermicro ========= Netperf Result (MB/s) - 112.21 Netperf3 Result (MB/s) - 112.22 Tbench Result (MB/s) - 114.48 Nttcp Result (Mb/s) - 946.55 However, if I hook it up to a different machine, problems started to occur. For example, with the Tyan S2720 Thunder i7500 board (E7500 chipset, Intel 82544EI onboard gigabit controller), I see good performance on the Tyan but not Supermicro. Supermicro ========= Netperf Result (MB/s) - 29.23 Netperf3 Result (MB/s) - 78.19 Tbench Result (MB/s) - 117.32 Nttcp Result (Mb/s) - 646.77 Tyan ==== Netperf Result (MB/s) - 112.22 Netperf3 Result (MB/s) - 112.02 Tbench Result (MB/s) - can't find it Nttcp Result (Mb/s) - 945.9 ------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/