Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752282AbbHUAbx (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:31:53 -0400 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:58973 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751249AbbHUAbw (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2015 20:31:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [media] staging: omap4iss: get entity ID using media_entity_id() To: Laurent Pinchart References: <1439998526-12832-1-git-send-email-javier@osg.samsung.com> <3021244.b1huftRsSL@avalon> <55D66D4D.2030307@osg.samsung.com> <1723673.4H9JUSKm09@avalon> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-media@vger.kernel.org From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <55D67172.7070705@osg.samsung.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 02:31:46 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1723673.4H9JUSKm09@avalon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1609 Lines: 41 Hello Laurent, On 08/21/2015 02:15 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Javier, > > On Friday 21 August 2015 02:14:05 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On 08/20/2015 08:37 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> On Wednesday 19 August 2015 17:35:19 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>>> The struct media_entity does not have an .id field anymore since >>>> now the entity ID is stored in the embedded struct media_gobj. >>>> >>>> This caused the omap4iss driver fail to build. Fix by using the >>>> media_entity_id() macro to obtain the entity ID. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas >>> >>> This looks fine to me. The patch needs to be moved between Mauro's 1/8 and >>> 2/8 patches to avoid breaking bisection with patch 3/8. I'd squash this >>> patch and 2/4 into a single "media: Use media_entity_id() in drivers" >>> patch. >> >> Yes, Hans and Mauro already mentioned it and I completely agree that >> should be squashed with Mauro's patch to maintain git bisect-ability. > > I wouldn't squash patches 1/4 and 2/4 into Mauro's 3/8 patch as Hans proposed, > but instead squashing them together into a single patch and move the result as > 1.5/8 in Mauro's series. > I see. I don't mind either option tbh, I'm OK with whatever works better. Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/