Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 06:35:52 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [x86] copy_from{to}_user question
Message-ID: <20150821043552.GA29712@nazgul.tnic>
References: <7FD389F5-C677-4439-8082-EB0CAE2814F6@gmail.com>
 <20150812100738.GA14020@nazgul.tnic>
 <9232AF8E-87A3-40B2-852A-D07889F9E1B4@gmail.com>
 <20150813164302.GA15881@nazgul.tnic>
 <6ABF6137-251E-47EF-B824-AC77C9C9AB24@gmail.com>
 <20150817041634.GA9387@nazgul.tnic>
 <55D61AF3.4090004@zytor.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <55D61AF3.4090004@zytor.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 841
Lines: 22

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:22:43AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> There is a valid reason to do this, which is that currently
> copy_{to,from}_user() effectively bypass SMAP as they don't verify that
> the kernel pointer is actually a kernel pointer.

Well, we do STAC before we copy but SMAP is checking for supervisor
access to *user* data. But you say "kernel pointers" which is supervisor
data. What am I missing?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/