Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:36:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:36:24 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:4626 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:34:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:40:02 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ingo Molnar cc: Zwane Mwaikambo , Chris Wedgwood , Kernel Mailing List , "Martin J. Bligh" , William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: doublefault debugging (was Re: Linux v2.5.62 --- spontaneous reboots) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 782 Lines: 19 On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Suggested patch (against current BK, which has the finish_task_switch() > cleanups I mentioned earlier) appended. No special cases, nu subtlety with > __put_task_struct() caches, no nothing. Yeah, don't bother to tell me it doesn't work. We need the task pointer to include information on _both_ "I'm still using it" (the task itself) _and_ the "I'm waiting for it" case. So it's not just a matter of moving the put_task() thing around, it needs to get the accounting right.. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/