Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753781AbbHWXN5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2015 19:13:57 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:36284 "EHLO mail-oi0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751491AbbHWXNz (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Aug 2015 19:13:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [2620:0:1000:157d:e022:a0ab:b617:664b] In-Reply-To: References: <1438618000-1091-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> <1439287646.9747.212.camel@citrix.com> Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:13:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dtb: Create a common home for cross-architecture dtsi files. From: Olof Johansson To: Rob Herring Cc: Ian Campbell , "arm@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Kumar Gala , Liviu Dudau , Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Kristina Martsenko , Kevin Hilman , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kbuild mailing list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2026 Lines: 48 On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > +arm-soc > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 17:06 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: >>> Commit 9ccd608070b6 ("arm64: dts: add device tree for ARM SMM-A53x2 on >>> LogicTile Express 20MG") added a new dts file to arch/arm64 which >>> included "../../../../arm/boot/dts/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi", i.e. a >>> .dtsi supplied by arch/arm. >>> >>> Unfortunately this causes some issues for the split device tree >>> repository[0], since things get moved around there. In that context >>> the new .dts ends up at src/arm64/arm/vexpress-v2f-1xv7-ca53x2.dts >>> while the include is at src/arm/vexpress-v2m-rs1.dtsi. >> >> Hi Grant, >> >> Do you think there is any chance of getting this into 4.2-rc$NEXT or shall >> we wait until 4.3? I'm assuming this should go via the DT tree, but maybe >> it should go via an ARM tree? > > I was assuming this would go thru the arm-soc tree which is why I > acked it. It is getting a bit late for 4.2 at this point, but I guess > the standalone tree remains broken for these platforms until this is > done. Probably not such a big deal in grand scheme of things. I'm cc:d in the far tail of a thread, so I'll just comment here instead of further up: I'm not a fan at all of creating kernel/dts//*, at least if there's expected to be contents in there. We don't have include/linux/asm-/ in the common tree either. Let's not create that for dts. So, while I'm all for a prefix-based sharing of DTSI files, I don't want them to go in a common kernel/dts directory. Besides sharing some snippets between arm and arm64, what else is expected to need to go into such a shared location today? -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/