Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753913AbbHXEZ5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:25:57 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f169.google.com ([209.85.192.169]:33094 "EHLO mail-pd0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752949AbbHXEZz (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2015 00:25:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:55:51 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Muhammad Falak R Wani Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq: Fix coding style issues Message-ID: <20150824042551.GC5375@linux> References: <1440348235-7789-1-git-send-email-falakreyaz@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1440348235-7789-1-git-send-email-falakreyaz@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1539 Lines: 47 On 23-08-15, 22:13, Muhammad Falak R Wani wrote: > This patch introduces a blank line after declarations, which > fix the checkpatch.pl warnings at 3 places. > > Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > index 8ae655c..5aea659 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -718,6 +718,7 @@ static ssize_t show_bios_limit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf) > { > unsigned int limit; > int ret; > + > if (cpufreq_driver->bios_limit) { > ret = cpufreq_driver->bios_limit(policy->cpu, &limit); > if (!ret) > @@ -815,6 +816,7 @@ unlock: > static void cpufreq_sysfs_release(struct kobject *kobj) > { > struct cpufreq_policy *policy = to_policy(kobj); > + > pr_debug("last reference is dropped\n"); > complete(&policy->kobj_unregister); > } > @@ -2129,6 +2131,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_unregister_governor); > int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu) > { > struct cpufreq_policy *cpu_policy; > + > if (!policy) > return -EINVAL; We don't really need a patch for this, unless Rafael wants to apply this one :) -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/