Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:26:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:26:17 -0500 Received: from clavin.efn.org ([206.163.176.10]:56563 "EHLO clavin.efn.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 17:25:59 -0500 From: Steve VanDevender MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14992.19419.179132.382838@localhost.efn.org> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 14:25:31 -0800 To: Andre Hedrick Cc: "Henning P . Schmiedehausen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux stifles innovation... In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20010218191350.A15956@forge.intermeta.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andre Hedrick writes: > Those are not threats they are terms to enforce the License you agreed > upon the very act of editing the source code that you are using in the > kernel. Get it right, Andre. The mere act of editing a file that is part of a GPL-licensed source distribution doesn't bind anyone to anything. Anyone can download GPLed source and edit it all they want without restriction, and they can also produce binaries for private use from those edited sources without restriction. However, if they want to distribute binaries derived from that source, edited or not, then the GPL requires that they also distribute the source. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/