Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:44:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:44:05 -0500 Received: from wiprom2mx1.wipro.com ([203.197.164.41]:48512 "EHLO wiprom2mx1.wipro.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:44:00 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.62 Lmbench performance Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:23:47 +0530 Message-ID: <94F20261551DC141B6B559DC4910867217CCC7@blr-m3-msg.wipro.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.62 Lmbench performance Thread-Index: AcLZl4HtL8tbCaLyQ+afMfDrscfXvA== From: "Aniruddha M Marathe" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Feb 2003 10:53:47.0204 (UTC) FILETIME=[8278D040:01C2D997] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5430 Lines: 95 Hi, Here are results of Lmbench for 2.5.62. Results don't differ much from 2.5.60. ********************************************************************************************* LMBENCH for kernel 2.5.62 ********************************************************************************************* L M B E N C H 2 . 0 S U M M A R Y ------------------------------------ (Alpha software, do not distribute) Basic system parameters ---------------------------------------------------- Host OS Description Mhz --------- ------------- ----------------------- ---- benchtest Linux 2.5.62 i686-pc-linux-gnu 790 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 i686-pc-linux-gnu 790 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 i686-pc-linux-gnu 790 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 i686-pc-linux-gnu 790 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 i686-pc-linux-gnu 790 Processor, Processes - times in microseconds - smaller is better ---------------------------------------------------------------- Host OS Mhz null null open selct sig sig fork exec sh call I/O stat clos TCP inst hndl proc proc proc --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 0.46 0.82 6.63 8.58 33 1.26 3.93 335 1332 6685 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 0.44 0.83 6.55 8.53 36 1.24 4.35 261 1301 6685 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 0.44 0.83 6.57 8.50 35 1.23 3.92 282 1267 6608 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 0.44 0.80 6.59 8.52 34 1.24 3.93 297 1289 6622 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 0.46 0.82 6.83 8.66 32 1.26 3.92 321 1340 6669 Context switching - times in microseconds - smaller is better ------------------------------------------------------------- Host OS 2p/0K 2p/16K 2p/64K 8p/16K 8p/64K 16p/16K 16p/64K ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw ctxsw --------- ------------- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ------- benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.410 4.7600 15 9.6900 176 40 177 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.440 4.7600 57 7.1800 180 40 178 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.480 5.1600 18 13 183 39 179 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.300 5.1500 14 5.9200 180 43 179 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.500 4.7800 14 6.4700 181 41 178 *Local* Communication latencies in microseconds - smaller is better ------------------------------------------------------------------- Host OS 2p/0K Pipe AF UDP RPC/ TCP RPC/ TCP ctxsw UNIX UDP TCP conn --------- ------------- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.410 8.588 14 23 46 30 57 101 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.440 8.374 14 32 46 31 57 102 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.480 8.133 13 23 67 30 57 102 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.300 8.305 14 24 46 30 58 102 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 1.500 8.200 14 24 46 30 57 102 File & VM system latencies in microseconds - smaller is better -------------------------------------------------------------- Host OS 0K File 10K File Mmap Prot Page Create Delete Create Delete Latency Fault Fault --------- ------------- ------ ------ ------ ------ ------- ----- ----- benchtest Linux 2.5.62 93 30 323 79 594 0.591 4.00000 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 93 30 325 82 650 0.592 4.00000 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 91 30 355 82 642 0.593 4.00000 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 94 30 326 82 606 0.589 4.00000 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 93 30 327 82 617 0.623 4.00000 *Local* Communication bandwidths in MB/s - bigger is better ----------------------------------------------------------- Host OS Pipe AF TCP File Mmap Bcopy Bcopy Mem Mem UNIX reread reread (libc) (hand) read write --------- ------------- ---- ---- ---- ------ ------ ------ ------ ---- ----- benchtest Linux 2.5.62 554 375 53 296 356 124 113 357 170 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 554 371 52 294 354 123 112 355 170 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 576 638 52 288 353 123 112 353 169 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 489 341 52 290 353 123 112 353 169 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 550 287 51 300 354 124 113 354 170 Memory latencies in nanoseconds - smaller is better (WARNING - may not be correct, check graphs) --------------------------------------------------- Host OS Mhz L1 $ L2 $ Main mem Guesses --------- ------------- ---- ----- ------ -------- ------- benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 3.803 8.8820 174 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 3.796 8.8820 175 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 3.808 8.8740 175 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 3.797 8.9410 175 benchtest Linux 2.5.62 790 3.808 8.8730 176 Aniruddha Marathe Wipro technology, India. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/