Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 06:40:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 06:40:24 -0500 Received: from smtp1.EUnet.yu ([194.247.192.50]:46803 "EHLO smtp1.eunet.yu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 06:40:23 -0500 From: Toplica =?utf-8?q?Tanaskovi=C4=87?= To: Samium Gromoff Subject: Re: AGP backport from 2.5 to 2.4.21-pre4 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:36:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030221122051.20942f70.deepfire@ibe.miee.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030221122051.20942f70.deepfire@ibe.miee.ru> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302211235.33025.toptan@EUnet.yu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by smtp1.eunet.yu id h1LBoRV21606 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 770 Lines: 24 Dana petak 21. februar 2003. 10:20, Samium Gromoff je napisao/la: > > From all this hardware only the KT400+R9000 pair possibly engage in AGP8x > transfers, and i`m suspicious whether R9000 does it at all... > No, AGP4x max. As I said I did only a few tests, due to lack of hardware. > > So i think somebody testing it on real AGP3.0-capable hardware would do > good... > That would be most apreciated. But I would like to see results for other chipsets AGP8x, AGP4x deosn't mather. -- Pozdrav, Tanasković Toplica - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/