Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:44:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:44:49 -0500 Received: from hal-4.inet.it ([213.92.5.23]:27384 "EHLO hal-4.inet.it") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:44:48 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: javaman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2.5.x, 2.4.x ...] very small Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:25:17 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <20030221144448Z267481-29901+571@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 23 A very small patch (my first patch :-) for Documentation/spinlocks.txt: it replace "IFF" with "IF" ;-) bye, Paolo --- Documentation/spinlocks.txt.orig Fri Feb 21 15:02:01 2003 +++ Documentation/spinlocks.txt Fri Feb 21 15:02:44 2003 @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ If you have a case where you have to protect a data structure across several CPU's and you want to use spinlocks you can potentially use -cheaper versions of the spinlocks. IFF you know that the spinlocks are +cheaper versions of the spinlocks. IF you know that the spinlocks are never used in interrupt handlers, you can use the non-irq versions: spin_lock(&lock); - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/