Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755576AbbHYNna (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:43:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f51.google.com ([209.85.220.51]:36497 "EHLO mail-pa0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691AbbHYNn2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:43:28 -0400 Message-ID: <1440510194.10987.52.camel@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: add Hi6220 mailbox node From: Haojian Zhuang To: Mark Rutland Cc: Leif Lindholm , "leo.yan@linaro.org" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jassi Brar , Bintian Wang , Yiping Xu , Wei Xu , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "guodong.xu@linaro.org" , Jian Zhang , Zhenwei Wang , Haoju Mo , Dan Zhao , "kongfei@hisilicon.com" , Guangyue Zeng Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 21:43:14 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20150825104256.GB13471@leverpostej> References: <1439977055-1747-1-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> <1439977055-1747-4-git-send-email-leo.yan@linaro.org> <20150821184059.GB2000@svinekod> <20150824091845.GA28290@leoy-linaro> <20150824095144.GA7139@leverpostej> <1440411596.3517.12.camel@linaro.org> <20150824114903.GT10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440490427.10987.29.camel@linaro.org> <20150825094630.GU10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440497710.10987.42.camel@linaro.org> <20150825104256.GB13471@leverpostej> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1559 Lines: 38 On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 11:42 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > Are you then going to hack GRUB, release a special HiKey version of > > > GRUB, not support any other versions, and still can your firmware > > > UEFI? > > > > I don't need to hack GRUB at all. > > Then it is working for you by pure chance alone. > > Please listen to the advice you are being given here; we're trying to > ensure that your platform functions (and continues to function) as best > it can. Since we discussed a lot on this, let's make a conclusion on it. 1. UEFI could append the reserved buffer in it's memory mapping. 2. These reserved buffer must be declared in DT, since we also need to support non-UEFI (uboot) at the same time. 3. Mailbox node should reference reserved buffer by phandle in DT. Then map the buffer as non-cacheable in driver. 4. These reserved buffer must use "no-map" property since it should be non-cacheable in driver. 5. A patch is necessary in kernel. If efi stub feature is enabled, arm kernel should not parse memory node or reserved memory buffer in DT any more. Arm kernel should either fetch memory information from efi or DT. Currently arm kernel fetch both efi memory information and reserved buffer from DTB at the same time. Do you agree on these points? Regards Haojian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/