Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755256AbbHYPpU (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:45:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ig0-f180.google.com ([209.85.213.180]:35802 "EHLO mail-ig0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751859AbbHYPpS (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:45:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150825153754.GY10728@bivouac.eciton.net> References: <20150824095144.GA7139@leverpostej> <1440411596.3517.12.camel@linaro.org> <20150824114903.GT10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440490427.10987.29.camel@linaro.org> <20150825094630.GU10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440497710.10987.42.camel@linaro.org> <20150825104256.GB13471@leverpostej> <1440510194.10987.52.camel@linaro.org> <20150825142416.GW10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <20150825153754.GY10728@bivouac.eciton.net> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:45:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: add Hi6220 mailbox node From: Ard Biesheuvel To: Leif Lindholm Cc: Haojian Zhuang , Mark Rutland , Dan Zhao , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jian Zhang , Guangyue Zeng , Yiping Xu , Jassi Brar , Wei Xu , Zhenwei Wang , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Bintian Wang , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "kongfei@hisilicon.com" , Rob Herring , Haoju Mo , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "guodong.xu@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "leo.yan@linaro.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1148 Lines: 37 On 25 August 2015 at 17:37, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> Arm kernel should either fetch memory information from >> >> efi or DT. >> > >> > Absolutely. >> > >> >> Currently arm kernel fetch both efi memory information and >> >> reserved buffer from DTB at the same time. >> > >> > No, it does not. >> >> It should not, but it does. Due to an oversight, the stub removes >> /memreserve/ entries but ignores the reserved-memory node completely. > > Urgh. > >> This was reported here in fact >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/5736/focus=5742 >> >> but there has not been a followup to this series. > > Are all of those patches still relevant, or did some of them go in > already? > The first two patches are in v4.2-rc1 and up, the others should still apply on top of that. -- Ard. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/