Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755756AbbHZCmH (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:42:07 -0400 Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:36755 "EHLO mail-io0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951AbbHZCmE (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:42:04 -0400 Message-ID: <1440556912.10987.54.camel@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] arm64: dts: add Hi6220 mailbox node From: Haojian Zhuang To: Leif Lindholm Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , Dan Zhao , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jian Zhang , Guangyue Zeng , Yiping Xu , Jassi Brar , Wei Xu , Zhenwei Wang , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Bintian Wang , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , "kongfei@hisilicon.com" , Rob Herring , Haoju Mo , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "guodong.xu@linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "leo.yan@linaro.org" Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:41:52 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20150825153754.GY10728@bivouac.eciton.net> References: <20150824095144.GA7139@leverpostej> <1440411596.3517.12.camel@linaro.org> <20150824114903.GT10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440490427.10987.29.camel@linaro.org> <20150825094630.GU10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <1440497710.10987.42.camel@linaro.org> <20150825104256.GB13471@leverpostej> <1440510194.10987.52.camel@linaro.org> <20150825142416.GW10728@bivouac.eciton.net> <20150825153754.GY10728@bivouac.eciton.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1268 Lines: 42 On Tue, 2015-08-25 at 16:37 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > >> Arm kernel should either fetch memory information from > > >> efi or DT. > > > > > > Absolutely. > > > > > >> Currently arm kernel fetch both efi memory information and > > >> reserved buffer from DTB at the same time. > > > > > > No, it does not. > > > > It should not, but it does. Due to an oversight, the stub removes > > /memreserve/ entries but ignores the reserved-memory node completely. > > Urgh. > > > This was reported here in fact > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.efi/5736/focus=5742 > > > > but there has not been a followup to this series. > > Are all of those patches still relevant, or did some of them go in > already? > > Haojian: can you give that patch a spin and see if it does what you > need, combined with adding the reserved areas to the UEFI memory map? > > / > Leif It's so nice. This patch is what I need. Thanks Haojian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/