Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756690AbbHZMB2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:01:28 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f172.google.com ([209.85.220.172]:33552 "EHLO mail-qk0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755582AbbHZMB0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:01:26 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:01:21 -0400 From: Jeff Layton To: Pratyush Anand Cc: bfields@fieldses.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "J. Bruce Fields" , Jeff Layton , open list , Trond Myklebust Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: sunrpc: fix tracepoint Warning: unknown op '->' Message-ID: <20150826080121.6612852b@tlielax.poochiereds.net> In-Reply-To: <20150826115225.GF13340@dhcppc13.redhat.com> References: <20150826063103.6f036582@tlielax.poochiereds.net> <20150826115225.GF13340@dhcppc13.redhat.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2185 Lines: 55 On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:22:25 +0530 Pratyush Anand wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > Thanks for your review comments. > > On 26/08/2015:06:31:03 AM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:34:19 +0530 > > Pratyush Anand wrote: > > > TP_fast_assign( > > > __entry->xprt = xprt; > > > + __entry->addr = > > > + xprt ? (struct sockaddr *)&xprt->xpt_remote : NULL; > > > > I don't get it. It's not safe to save a pointer to xprt and dereference > > that in a tracepoint (and I understand why that is), but it is safe to > > save a pointer to a structure embedded inside of xprt? Shouldn't you be > > saving a copy of the entire sockaddr struct instead? > > As far as "saving of a pointer to a structure embedded inside of xprt" is > concerned, I do not see any issue. > > Its your take that what you want to print as your tracepoint print output. I > might be missing something.. However, I do not see any value addition in > printing address of a structure(located in ring buffer) where xprt->xpt_remote > has been copied. > > > > > Ahh, ok -- I think I see the confusion. %pIScp does not print the > > address of the sockaddr, but instead dereferences the pointer and > > prints it as a formatted address string. See pointer() in > > lib/vsprintf.c. You do want to save off a copy of the structure instead. > > In my opinion, saving of structure would only be necessary if you want to access > element of the structure xprt->xpt_remote. > > ~Pratyush That's exactly what %pI does. Look at the pointer() function. For this tracepoint, we want to print out the address of the remote end of the socket. That's saved in xprt->xpt_remote. %pIScp doesn't print the pointer's address. It dereferences that pointer and formats and prints the socket address that it points to. If you pass a NULL pointer into anything that uses %pI, it's going to oops. -- Jeff Layton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/