Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:04:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:04:57 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:50954 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:04:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 22:15:03 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: "Moore, Robert" , "Grover, Andrew" , "Walz, Michael" , t-kochi@bq.jp.nec.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [ACPI] [PATCH] 1/3 ACPI resource handling Message-ID: <20030221221503.F19234@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200302211509.15641.bjorn_helgaas@hp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200302211509.15641.bjorn_helgaas@hp.com>; from bjorn_helgaas@hp.com on Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:09:15PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 870 Lines: 18 On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:09:15PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Or, since you mention a macro, maybe your question is not about > the usefulness of acpi_resource_to_address64() itself, but about > how I implemented it, namely, with the copy_field and copy_address > macros: Can I suggest that you do a simple memcpy() for the case where you're translating an address64 into an address64? -- "It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies. Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/