Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:04:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:04:52 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:2815 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:04:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:12:20 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Martijn Uffing Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Older bk snapshots not found on www.kernel.org (fwd) Message-Id: <20030221171220.0674e3f7.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2003 01:14:52.0652 (UTC) FILETIME=[CD7A8AC0:01C2DA0F] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1057 Lines: 27 Martijn Uffing wrote: > > > Ave people. > > I know www.xx.kernel.org has nice bk snapshots in the form > of patch-2.5.x-bkx.gz However,they are only against the latest linus > release. The problem is I have a 100% repeatable OOPS in 2.5.62 while > 2.5.61 worked. Before I send in a bug report I want to nail it down to > which bk snapshot starts failing to make it a little easier for the > bughunters to find the bug. Is there any website/ftp whatever which > collects older bk snapshots? I just run a script to snarf them. I've uploaded the 2.5.61->2.5.62 snapshots to http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.61/snapshots/ each one of these is a diff against 2.5.61. If you can narrow it down to the offending one, that would be a big start. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/