Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:18:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:18:11 -0500 Received: from netlx014.civ.utwente.nl ([130.89.1.88]:64722 "EHLO netlx014.civ.utwente.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Feb 2003 20:18:10 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 02:26:35 +0100 (CET) From: Martijn Uffing To: Andrew Morton cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Older bk snapshots not found on www.kernel.org (fwd) In-Reply-To: <20030221171220.0674e3f7.akpm@digeo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1189 Lines: 36 On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Andrew Morton wrote: > Martijn Uffing wrote: > > > > > > Ave people. > > > > I know www.xx.kernel.org has nice bk snapshots in the form > > of patch-2.5.x-bkx.gz However,they are only against the latest linus > > release. The problem is I have a 100% repeatable OOPS in 2.5.62 while > > 2.5.61 worked. Before I send in a bug report I want to nail it down to > > which bk snapshot starts failing to make it a little easier for the > > bughunters to find the bug. Is there any website/ftp whatever which > > collects older bk snapshots? > > I just run a script to snarf them. > > I've uploaded the 2.5.61->2.5.62 snapshots to > > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/2.5/2.5.61/snapshots/ > > each one of these is a diff against 2.5.61. If you can narrow it down to the > offending one, that would be a big start. > Thanx! The hunt has started :) Greetz Mu - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/