MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150826134923.9d8fad571de4be237a84ff50@linux-foundation.org>
References: <CAE9FiQXWXPexLM8xma8Cb9R9hpR2+tOwzGtmJxzH5uuyPraDpQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150821202707.GA920@agluck-desk.sc.intel.com>
	<CAE9FiQU-=oAzi_benuEm=x_Y_LUp48uND6cGnx9osbYyPWySdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+8MBbL4nqTxi14Lz92PRFZeobHBLimSfcTH=9HaZBcEUpLVOg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE9FiQVJozeJ9R9GgMEVPfJaSJL+J+M3ULu2VXPjrdDqnYGwvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+8MBb+yJ9ywFnmfCAEPF0ZBQfH1R9b8hzmwVpM8+rsyJkEW5Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE9FiQUDb=uNKV9Bj34v3vvMT04MiuoRHqTq6=KTMd+DVrMVNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+8MBbK6wu+7-M+fP8_GMmhUDSMZ4akOVRkW8xaP8x0pqJN0bQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE9FiQUAAQZ4RF9rTxthBCJAJyDkw1g3dckfeJ870gqK9Dzg9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAE9FiQXH0SxTCaw-J=nEhYtbuZfBDU3R+v_XRZYF6ymeXnPsgg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150826041716.GA14102@gmail.com>
	<CAE9FiQXFHWNR41yEDjj=tAteanbngXQNQcwZvvVVexRmAQTTeA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150826134923.9d8fad571de4be237a84ff50@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:15:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQXN6ziZVgiZWdut6JyGze8LyW5hkikdWnREq8aCwAUvpA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] Use 2GB memory block size on large-memory x86-64 systems
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@gmail.com>,
        Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1158
Lines: 31

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:42:05 -0700 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> I don't know what that means.  We have multiple patches under at least
> two different Subject:s.  Please be very careful and very specific when
> identifying patches.  Otherwise mistakes will be made.
>
>
> I presently have three patches:
>
> mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-unregistering.patch
> mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-unregistering-v2.patch
> mm-check-if-section-present-during-memory-block-unregistering-v2-fix.patch
>
> When these are consolidated together, this is the result:

Please drop all three, and apply v3 directly from

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7080111/

we should not touch unregiser path, as unregister_memory_section()
already check if the section is present before.

Thanks

Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/