Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752192AbbH0Jkm (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 05:40:42 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:58551 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbbH0Jkk (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 05:40:40 -0400 Message-ID: <1440668430.3233.68.camel@pengutronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] gpu: imx: fix support for interlaced modes From: Philipp Zabel To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andy Yan , Yakir Yang , Fabio Estevam , Sascha Hauer , Jon Nettleton Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:40:30 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150827085411.GE21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20150808160251.GM7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1440664752.3233.36.camel@pengutronix.de> <20150827085411.GE21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:96de:80ff:fec2:9969 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 5216 Lines: 127 Am Donnerstag, den 27.08.2015, 09:54 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 10:39:12AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote: > > Hi Russell, > > > > Am Samstag, den 08.08.2015, 17:03 +0100 schrieb Russell King: > > > The support for interlaced video modes seems to be broken; we don't use > > > anything other than the vtotal/htotal from the timing information to > > > define the various sync counters. > > > > I finally made time to test this series: > > > > Tested-by: Philipp Zabel > > on i.MX6 GK802 via HDMI connected to a TV (1080p60, 1080i60). > > > > Unfortunately these timings are completely different from what Freescale > > came up with for the TV Encoder on i.MX5, but the code we have currently > > in mainline doesn't work for that either. I suppose I'll follow up with > > a patch that adds yet another sync counter setup for the i.MX5/TVE case. > > > > I'd like to take the two ipu-v3 patches, making a few small changes on > > this one: > > Please don't split the series up. The reason it's a series is because > there's interdependencies between the patches. In that case, can I take the whole series? Or would you like to respin and have my Acked-by: Philipp Zabel with the changes below: > > > Freescale patches for interlaced video support contain an alternative > > > sync counter setup, which we include here. This setup produces the > > > hsync and vsync via the normal counter 2 and 3, but moves the display > > > enable signal from counter 5 to counter 6. Therefore, we need to > > > change the display controller setup as well. > > > > > > The corresponding Freescale patches for this change are: > > > iMX6-HDMI-support-interlaced-display-mode.patch > > > IPU-fine-tuning-the-interlace-display-timing-for-CEA.patch > > > > > > This produces a working interlace format output from the IPU. > > > > ... on i.MX6 via HDMI. > > It should also be correct for any other source which wants interlaced > output. ... on i.MX6, then. Right now I don't know what is the effect of the undocumented settings on the i.MX5's IPUv3M. > > > Signed-off-by: Russell King > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c | 18 ++++++++--- > > > drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-di.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > > 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c > > > index 9ef2e1f54ca4..aa560855c1dc 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/ipu-v3/ipu-dc.c > > > @@ -183,12 +183,22 @@ int ipu_dc_init_sync(struct ipu_dc *dc, struct ipu_di *di, bool interlaced, > > > } > > > > > > if (interlaced) { > > > - dc_link_event(dc, DC_EVT_NL, 0, 3); > > > - dc_link_event(dc, DC_EVT_EOL, 0, 2); > > > - dc_link_event(dc, DC_EVT_NEW_DATA, 0, 1); > > > + int word, addr; > > > + > > > + if (dc->di) { > > > + addr = 1; > > > + word = 1; > > > > These two are really one and the same. The address written to the link > > register for the given event has to point to the address of the > > microcode instruction written to the template memory that should be > > executed on this event. > > > > I'd like to drop the word variable and use addr for both. > > Ok. As I said in the commit message, this code comes from Freescale's > patches which I pointed to above. [...] > > > @@ -211,66 +215,59 @@ static void ipu_di_sync_config_interlaced(struct ipu_di *di, > > > sig->mode.hback_porch + sig->mode.hfront_porch; > > > u32 v_total = sig->mode.vactive + sig->mode.vsync_len + > > > sig->mode.vback_porch + sig->mode.vfront_porch; > > > - u32 reg; > > > struct di_sync_config cfg[] = { > > > { > > > - .run_count = h_total / 2 - 1, > > > - .run_src = DI_SYNC_CLK, > > > + /* 1: internal VSYNC for each frame */ > > > + .run_count = v_total * 2 - 1, > > > + .run_src = 3, /* == counter 7 */ > > > > Do you know why this works? The Reference Manual v2 lists that value as > > "NA" in the DI counter #1 Run Resolution field. > > Yes, I noticed that Freescale were using values for the source fields > which were marked as NA in the manual. As it works, I can only assume > that the engineer who came up with this setup has more knowledge than > is public. I'd like small a comment here that yes, we know this is marked as NA/Reserved in the manuals. [...] > I went through the counter setup to understand how it works, and it > seems correct provided you accept that the various source values do > work as the code claims, which includes creating the vsync at the > appropriate half-scanline position without needing this hack. > > It's not easy to work back from the counter setup to get a mental > picture of what's going on, but it is possible to do so. Yes, being able to actually reference counters with higher numbers makes things a lot easier to follow. regards Philipp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/