Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751823AbbH0Tay (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:30:54 -0400 Received: from mail-yk0-f181.google.com ([209.85.160.181]:35538 "EHLO mail-yk0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbbH0Taw (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:30:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <10828643.SSUS2EOuvv@phil> References: <1439923455-109818-1-git-send-email-briannorris@chromium.org> <20150818224831.GA140911@google.com> <20150818232806.GC140911@google.com> <10828643.SSUS2EOuvv@phil> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:30:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ncHDWv_bushQ5gEtGdSVOpkKauk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: rockchip: correct regulator PM properties From: Doug Anderson To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: Brian Norris , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Norris , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Alexandru M Stan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 851 Lines: 21 Hi, On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:19 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > great, just take into account the deep vs. shallow suspend modes :-) One note: do you think it would make sense to re-implement shallow suspend as "standby"? I had a proof of concept doing that in . One nice advantage is that you "magically" get a second set of regulator states for standby vs "mem". If I understand correctly, the distinction between "standby" and "mem" is not too clearly defined, so if we wanted to use it for this it wouldn't be terrible? -Doug -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/