Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752444AbbH0WMN (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:12:13 -0400 Received: from lists.s-osg.org ([54.187.51.154]:60591 "EHLO lists.s-osg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751267AbbH0WMK (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:12:10 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] selftests/zram: Adding zram tests To: naresh.kamboju@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1439881319-9727-1-git-send-email-naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> <55DF5288.4040405@osg.samsung.com> Cc: tyler.baker@linaro.org, milosz.wasilewski@linaro.org, alexey.kodanev@oracle.com, Shuah Khan From: Shuah Khan X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Organization: Samsung Open Source Group Message-ID: <55DF8B37.4060508@osg.samsung.com> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 16:12:07 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55DF5288.4040405@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1870 Lines: 51 On 08/27/2015 12:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 08/18/2015 01:01 AM, naresh.kamboju@linaro.org wrote: >> From: Naresh Kamboju >> >> zram: Compressed RAM based block devices >> ---------------------------------------- >> The zram module creates RAM based block devices named /dev/zram >> ( = 0, 1, ...). Pages written to these disks are compressed and stored >> in memory itself. These disks allow very fast I/O and compression provides >> good amounts of memory savings. Some of the usecases include /tmp storage, >> use as swap disks, various caches under /var and maybe many more :) >> >> Statistics for individual zram devices are exported through sysfs nodes at >> /sys/block/zram/ >> >> This patch is to validate the zram functionality. Test interacts with block >> device /dev/zram and sysfs nodes /sys/block/zram/ >> > > Hi Naresh, > > This doesn't fail gracefully when a regular user runs it. Please add > a check for root and make the test fail gracefully when a non-root > user runs it. > > Please refer to tools/testing/selftests/efivarfs/efivarfs.sh > for an example on how to check for root. > > I was getting ready to apply this to linux-kselftest next for 4.3 > and ran some sanity tests. If you get me new revision quickly > I can get it into 4.3-rc1. Hi Naresh, The patch is now in linux-kselftest next. Please send a fix in for the non-root case for me get it into 4.3-rc1 or rc2. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/