Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:29:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:29:02 -0500 Received: from e2.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.102]:9432 "EHLO e2.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 16:29:01 -0500 To: Alan Cox cc: Larry McVoy , Hanna Linder , lse-tech@lists.sf.et, Linux Kernel Mailing List Reply-To: Gerrit Huizenga From: Gerrit Huizenga Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call In-reply-to: Your message of 22 Feb 2003 18:20:19 GMT. <1045938019.5034.9.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <16488.1045949791.1@us.ibm.com> Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 13:36:31 -0800 Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 952 Lines: 20 On 22 Feb 2003 18:20:19 GMT, Alan Cox wrote: > I think people overestimate the numbner of large boxes badly. Several IDE > pre-patches didn't work on highmem boxes. It took *ages* for people to > actually notice there was a problem. The desktop world is still 128-256Mb IDE on big boxes? Is that crack I smell burning? A desktop with 4 GB is a fun toy, but bigger than *I* need, even for development purposes. But I don't think EMC, Clariion (low end EMC), Shark, etc. have any IDE products for my 8-proc 16 GB machine... And running pre-patches in a production environment that might expose this would be a little silly as well. Probably a bad example to extrapolate large system numbers from. gerrit - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/