Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753285AbbH1SKJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:10:09 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:54869 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752816AbbH1SKG (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:10:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 13:10:00 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Dmitry Vyukov Cc: Jiri Slaby , LKML , Andrey Konovalov , Kostya Serebryany , Alexander Potapenko Subject: Re: Potential data race in flush_to_ldisc Message-ID: <20150828181000.GB16113@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23+102 (2ca89bed6448) (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2829 Lines: 75 On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 06:57:17PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > Hello, > > We are working on a dynamic data race detector for the Linux kernel, > KernelThreadSanitizer (ktsan): > https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki > > While booting kernel (upstream revision 21bdb584af8c) we got a report: > > ThreadSanitizer: data-race in release_tty > > Write of size 8 by thread T325 (K2579): > [] release_tty+0xf3/0x1c0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1688 > [] tty_release+0x698/0x7c0 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:1920 > [] __fput+0x15f/0x310 fs/file_table.c:207 > [] ____fput+0x1d/0x30 fs/file_table.c:243 > [] task_work_run+0x115/0x130 kernel/task_work.c:123 > (discriminator 1) > [< inlined >] do_notify_resume+0x73/0x80 > tracehook_notify_resume include/linux/tracehook.h:190 > [] do_notify_resume+0x73/0x80 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:757 > [] int_signal+0x12/0x17 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:326 > > Previous read of size 8 by thread T19 (K16): > [] flush_to_ldisc+0x29/0x300 drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:472 > [] process_one_work+0x47e/0x930 kernel/workqueue.c:2036 > [] worker_thread+0xb0/0x900 kernel/workqueue.c:2170 > [] kthread+0x150/0x170 kernel/kthread.c:207 > [] ret_from_fork+0x3f/0x70 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:526 > > > flush_to_ldisc accesses port->itty: > > static void flush_to_ldisc(struct work_struct *work) > { > ... > tty = port->itty; > if (tty == NULL) > return; > disc = tty_ldisc_ref(tty); > > while release_tty concurrently sets itty to NULL: > > static void release_tty(struct tty_struct *tty, int idx) > { > ... > tty->port->itty = NULL; > if (tty->link) > tty->link->port->itty = NULL; > cancel_work_sync(&tty->port->buf.work); > tty_kref_put(tty->link); > tty_kref_put(tty); > } > > It seems that read of port->itty requires to be at least READ_ONCE, > because otherwise flush_to_ldisc can check that itty is not NULL, then > re-read it again and crash with NULL deref. > I don't know what is ownership and locking story here. There can be > larger issue here: either a lock is missing, or itty can be deleted > under flush_to_ldisc feet. > > Please confirm that this is real but. If so please fix it. Patches are always gladly accepted. Don't force us to try to determine if your tool is finding false-positives or not. That is your responsibility, not ours :) thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/