Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:35:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:35:57 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:41655 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 22 Feb 2003 18:35:56 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:46:01 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Larry McVoy cc: Mark Hahn , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call Message-ID: <3960000.1045957560@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <20030222232029.GB31268@work.bitmover.com> References: <1370000.1045955447@[10.10.2.4]> <20030222232029.GB31268@work.bitmover.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 669 Lines: 17 >> We would never try to propose such a change, and never have. >> Name a scalability change that's hurt the performance of UP by 5%. >> There isn't one. > > This is *exactly* the reasoning that every OS marketing weenie has used > for the last 20 years to justify their "feature" of the week. Fine, stick 'em all together. I bet it's either an improvement or doesn't even register on the scale. Knock yourself out. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/