Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753413AbbH3Kg6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:36:58 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:56243 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753219AbbH3Kg4 (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Aug 2015 06:36:56 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,434,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="634882863" From: "Winkler, Tomas" To: "emilne@redhat.com" , James Bottomley CC: Christoph Hellwig , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Douglas Gilbert , "Martin K. Petersen" Subject: RE: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule_resp fix input variable check Thread-Topic: [scsi 5/7 RESEND] scsi_debug: schedule_resp fix input variable check Thread-Index: AQHQ32+j1KYEjmja306nfUa52gh2054dMY2ggAGNxQCAAVRZgIAESnLQ Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2015 10:36:52 +0000 Message-ID: <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B3D432483@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1438091666-18113-1-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <1438091666-18113-5-git-send-email-tomas.winkler@intel.com> <1440532371.23183.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> <5B8DA87D05A7694D9FA63FD143655C1B3D42E9D0@hasmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com> <1440632280.2196.94.camel@HansenPartnership.com> <1440705369.23183.142.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1440705369.23183.142.camel@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.184.70.11] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id t7UAb2Rp012645 Content-Length: 1220 Lines: 28 > > > > > > > > > I'm just not sure why the patches are not merged or even rejected. > > > > Because ideally I want a Maintainer ack. That's Doug Gilbert. James The patches were discussed and the ACked by Doug in February and reviewed again after resend by Martin Petersen > > > > > I'm submitting patches to the Linux kernel for more than 10 years to > > > various trees and I can agree that these are not some urgent fixes, > > > but this is the first time my effort is ignored for such long time by > > > the maintainer. > > > > Well, OK, I trust martin, I'll override the lack of Maintainer ack if > > you fix as Ewan suggests. > > Just to clarify, I didn't have a problem with Tomas' patch per se, it's > just that my patch won't apply on top of his. I'll submit a v2 if you > want, so you can apply Tomas' patch first. The problem I'm fixing has > been in there for a while. Let me know if you want me to do that. > Hopefully your patch should be applied above my patches but I can make that effort and stack them on top of yours. Thanks ????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m???? ????????I?