Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:38:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@gmail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric?= Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
        Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
        Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
        Tony Li <tony.li@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/15] x86, amd: add accessor for number of cores per
 compute unit
Message-ID: <20150831133809.GM19282@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1440662866-28716-1-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com>
 <1440662866-28716-10-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com>
 <20150828064814.GB20153@nazgul.tnic>
 <20150828080418.GB13309@gmail.com>
 <20150829091914.GA8878@gmail.com>
 <20150830155322.GA26370@nazgul.tnic>
 <20150831083821.GE16853@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
 <55E455E8.1060208@roeck-us.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55E455E8.1060208@roeck-us.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1282
Lines: 29

On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 06:26:00AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 08/31/2015 01:38 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 05:53:22PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 11:19:14AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >>>So let me withdraw my ack: the much more important question that I
> >>>missed first time around, why is this reporting feature living in
> >>>hwmon, not in perf? We have energy reporting facilities in perf that
> >>>this should be synced to.
> >>
> >>Because there's already fam15h_power driver which is exactly for that.
> >>Making it part of perf is then a question of cat-ting the same sysfs
> >>file twice, at the beginning and at the end of the trace, which is
> >>trivial.
> >
> >That don't make sense.
> >
> >Looking at the BKDG Fam 15h 60h-6Fh these MSRs are per compute unit.
> >This means you can do much finer grained measurements than system wide
> >-- which is all hwmon seems capable of.
> >
> 
> Is it ? Why ?

Dunno, because there's that big old loop iterating all cpus?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/