Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129412AbRBSJbZ>; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:31:25 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129409AbRBSJbP>; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:31:15 -0500
Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]:30536 "EHLO
	mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129358AbRBSJbL>; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 04:31:11 -0500
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:31:05 -0600 (CST)
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>
To: Thomas Lau <lkthomas@hkicable.com>
cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: anyone can tell me 2.4.2 is stable or not?
In-Reply-To: <3A90848D.BA030697@hkicable.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010219032949.17784A-100000@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Thomas Lau wrote:
> is it stable for use?

Is the world a wonderful, beautiful place?

Both are subjective questions.  2.4 has been stable for me for quite a
long time, as it has been for many others.  It totally depends on your
hardware, and what you are doing.  I would say for the most part, yes.

	Jeff




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/