Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:03:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:03:02 -0500 Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]:8142 "EHLO palrel12.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:03:02 -0500 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15961.7487.465791.980935@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:13:03 -0800 To: David Lang Cc: Gerrit Huizenga , Benjamin LaHaise , William Lee Irwin III , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.2.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 921 Lines: 19 >>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 00:07:50 -0800 (PST), David Lang said: David.L> Garrit, you missed the preior posters point. IA64 had the David.L> same fundamental problem as the Alpha, PPC, and Sparc David.L> processors, it doesn't run x86 binaries. This simply isn't true. Itanium and Itanium 2 have full x86 hardware built into the chip (for better or worse ;-). The speed isn't as good as the fastest x86 chips today, but it's faster (~300MHz P6) than the PCs many of us are using and it certainly meets my needs better than any other x86 "emulation" I have used in the past (which includes FX!32 and its relatives for Alpha). --david - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/