Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753880AbbKBPCW (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:02:22 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:35218 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752221AbbKBPCU (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2015 10:02:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 16:02:18 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Vivien Didelot Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" , Florian Fainelli , Guenter Roeck , Neil Armstrong Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: assert SMI lock Message-ID: <20151102150218.GC7963@lunn.ch> References: <1446245805-24128-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1446245805-24128-1-git-send-email-vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4645 Lines: 149 On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:56:45PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote: > It's easy to forget to lock the smi_mutex before calling the low-level > _mv88e6xxx_reg_{read,write}, so add a assert_smi_lock function in them. > > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot Acked-by: Andrew Lunn Since there is no followup fixes patch, i assume we actually have it correct at the moment? Thanks Andrew > --- > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c | 25 ++++++++++++++----------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c > index b1b14f5..78a179b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c > @@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ > #include > #include "mv88e6xxx.h" > > +static void assert_smi_lock(struct dsa_switch *ds) > +{ > + struct mv88e6xxx_priv_state *ps = ds_to_priv(ds); > + > + if (unlikely(!mutex_is_locked(&ps->smi_mutex))) { > + dev_err(ds->master_dev, "SMI lock not held!\n"); > + dump_stack(); > + } > +} > + > /* If the switch's ADDR[4:0] strap pins are strapped to zero, it will > * use all 32 SMI bus addresses on its SMI bus, and all switch registers > * will be directly accessible on some {device address,register address} > @@ -80,12 +90,13 @@ int __mv88e6xxx_reg_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int sw_addr, int addr, int reg) > return ret & 0xffff; > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg) > { > struct mii_bus *bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev); > int ret; > > + assert_smi_lock(ds); > + > if (bus == NULL) > return -EINVAL; > > @@ -143,12 +154,13 @@ int __mv88e6xxx_reg_write(struct mii_bus *bus, int sw_addr, int addr, > return 0; > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_reg_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int reg, > u16 val) > { > struct mii_bus *bus = dsa_host_dev_to_mii_bus(ds->master_dev); > > + assert_smi_lock(ds); > + > if (bus == NULL) > return -EINVAL; > > @@ -204,7 +216,6 @@ int mv88e6xxx_set_addr_indirect(struct dsa_switch *ds, u8 *addr) > return 0; > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int regnum) > { > if (addr >= 0) > @@ -212,7 +223,6 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int regnum) > return 0xffff; > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_write(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, int regnum, > u16 val) > { > @@ -538,7 +548,6 @@ out: > mutex_unlock(&ps->smi_mutex); > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds) > { > int ret; > @@ -553,7 +562,6 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_stats_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds) > return -ETIMEDOUT; > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port) > { > int ret; > @@ -576,7 +584,6 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_stats_snapshot(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port) > return 0; > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static void _mv88e6xxx_stats_read(struct dsa_switch *ds, int stat, u32 *val) > { > u32 _val; > @@ -789,7 +796,6 @@ void mv88e6xxx_get_regs(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, > } > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI lock held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds, int reg, int offset, > u16 mask) > { > @@ -839,14 +845,12 @@ int mv88e6xxx_eeprom_busy_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds) > GLOBAL2_EEPROM_OP_BUSY); > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI lock held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_atu_wait(struct dsa_switch *ds) > { > return _mv88e6xxx_wait(ds, REG_GLOBAL, GLOBAL_ATU_OP, > GLOBAL_ATU_OP_BUSY); > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_read_indirect(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, > int regnum) > { > @@ -865,7 +869,6 @@ static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_read_indirect(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, > return _mv88e6xxx_reg_read(ds, REG_GLOBAL2, GLOBAL2_SMI_DATA); > } > > -/* Must be called with SMI mutex held */ > static int _mv88e6xxx_phy_write_indirect(struct dsa_switch *ds, int addr, > int regnum, u16 val) > { > -- > 2.6.2 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/