Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more
 compatible
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
References: <1443147298-12603-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com>
 <5632E765.4010207@gmail.com> <56334995.6090103@linaro.org>
 <21587719.mnFBFBzBeI@phil>
Cc: Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@gmail.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <56379D46.1000402@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 18:28:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <21587719.mnFBFBzBeI@phil>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2425
Lines: 63

On 10/31/2015 12:47 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Freitag, 30. Oktober 2015, 11:42:29 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>> On 10/30/2015 04:43 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> 在 2015年10月01日 03:14, Heiko Stübner 写道:
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>> Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
>>>>> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote:
>>>>>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform,
>>>>>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Says:
>>>>>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at  operand
>>>>>> 1 --
>>>>>> `dsb`
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64,
>>>>>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param
>>>>>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and
>>>>>> dsb(sy)
>>>>>> are the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>
>>>>> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>> as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them
>>>> to go
>>>> through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right?
>>>
>>> I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-)
>>> In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:-
>>
>> Yes, by acking the patch I say I am ok with it and I agree it can go
>> through another tree.
>
> although I guess the two clocksource changes could very well just go
> through your tree. dsb() -> dsb(sy) is supposed to be equal and the second
> one is just cosmetics.  The Kconfig and dts changes need to wait in any case
> for 4.5 ... but I guess that may be true for the clocksource changes as well?

Heiko, Caesar,

I am wondering if the dsb() is really necessary. Is it possible you test 
the timer by removing this instruction ? Otherwise I will have to setup 
my board again and it will take awhile.


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/