Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:03:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:03:06 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:12224 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:03:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:13:00 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: davidm@hpl.hp.com, Linus Torvalds cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call Message-ID: <9280000.1046031179@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <15961.8482.577861.679601@napali.hpl.hp.com> References: <20030223082036.GI10411@holomorphy.com> <15961.8482.577861.679601@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 861 Lines: 21 > Linus> Look at them the right way and you realize that a lot of the > Linus> grottyness is exactly _why_ the x86 works so well (yeah, and > Linus> the fact that they are everywhere ;). > > But does x86 reall work so well? Itanium 2 on 0.13um performs a lot > better than P4 on 0.13um. As far as I can guess, the only reason P4 > comes out on 0.13um (and 0.09um) before anything else is due to the > latter part you mention: it's where the volume is today. Care to share those impressive benchmark numbers (for macro-benchmarks)? Would be interesting to see the difference, and where it wins. Thanks, M - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/