Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754142AbbKBS0E (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:26:04 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:48774 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752669AbbKBS0B (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 2 Nov 2015 13:26:01 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5637A1EB.9080002@codeaurora.org>
References: <1446444460-21600-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>
 <1446444460-21600-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <CAL_Jsq+XCkaPD_Bop_BaTfEVP2YuOQ+=ChFvyLN47jps2NcZSA@mail.gmail.com>
 <56378D38.9050509@codeaurora.org> <56379CD6.5020807@codeaurora.org>
 <CAL_JsqJYOe+uE1VE_ojSq=Hx=2roW1CAiB2Hyow0tKUR85cV0Q@mail.gmail.com> <5637A1EB.9080002@codeaurora.org>
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 12:25:38 -0600
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLeDEUk6fQN4J20jL5Yma12ucNb0V7PxbQqUC6jJUH3oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] dma: add Qualcomm Technologies HIDMA management driver
To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
        Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
        "jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 912
Lines: 30

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 11/02/2015 11:42 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Timur Tabi<timur@codeaurora.org>  wrote:
>>>
>>> >On 11/02/2015 10:20 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>> >>Is there a good example I can look or a wiki about the device-tree
>>>> >>naming conventions?
>>
>> There are many examples. Generally, it is the form of:
>>
>> <vendor>,<chip/soc>-<block name>
>>
>
> The problem is that we don't actually have an official name for this chip
> yet.

Then document it with "<chip>" and fill that in later. Just don't make
up version numbers.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/