Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:44:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:44:13 -0500 Received: from 5-077.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br ([200.193.163.77]:39646 "EHLO 5-077.ctame701-1.telepar.net.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:44:12 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:53:58 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel To: David Mansfield cc: David Mansfield , "" , Marc-Christian Petersen Subject: Re: oom killer and its superior braindamage in 2.4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 28 On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, David Mansfield wrote: > So you're saying that a process can stay in the D state, without ever > getting enough resources to complete a single Uninteruptible wait, for > hours at a time? Or even in the R state, but that would only happen when there is a kernel bug. The OOM killer can do nothing but hope for the best and try another process if the first one doesn't want to exit. > Ok. Now I understand your patch. Thanks for the info. > > You should push your patch to Marcelo. Will do. cheers, Rik -- Engineers don't grow up, they grow sideways. http://www.surriel.com/ http://kernelnewbies.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/