Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:51:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:51:03 -0500 Received: from dodge.jordet.nu ([217.13.8.142]:30615 "EHLO dodge.hybel") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:51:02 -0500 Subject: Re: High load with 2.5.x From: Stian Jordet To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030223215811.GJ10411@holomorphy.com> References: <1046036480.29501.5.camel@chevrolet.hybel> <20030223215811.GJ10411@holomorphy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1046041270.687.6.camel@chevrolet.hybel> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 24 Feb 2003 00:01:11 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 995 Lines: 23 s?n, 2003-02-23 kl. 22:58 skrev William Lee Irwin III: > On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 10:41:21PM +0100, Stian Jordet wrote: > > I have the last 2.5.x kernels experienced a high load while idle. 1.00 > > mostly. I have dual cpu, and it isn't really bothering me. But I do not > > experience this with 2.4.x kernels. I do not remember when this started, > > but since noone else complains, I just want to ask how can I find out > > what is making my load so high? > > top(1) should report cpu time consumers. But it didn't. But as others have replied to me off-list, processes in D state make the loadaverage high. My problem was [kIrDAd]. Compiling kernel without irda actually solved several problems. So now I'm just happy :) Thanks :) Regards, Stian - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/