Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:56:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:56:55 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:23718 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:56:54 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 15:06:56 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: davidm@hpl.hp.com, Linus Torvalds cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Minutes from Feb 21 LSE Call Message-ID: <32500000.1046041615@[10.10.2.4]> In-Reply-To: <15961.19948.882374.766245@napali.hpl.hp.com> References: <15961.8482.577861.679601@napali.hpl.hp.com> <15961.19948.882374.766245@napali.hpl.hp.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 930 Lines: 25 > Linus> Last I saw P4 was kicking ia-64 butt on specint and friends. > > I don't think so. According to Intel [1], the highest clockfrequency > for a 0.18um part is 2GHz (both for Xeon and P4, for Xeon MP it's > 1.5GHz). The highest reported SPECint for a 2GHz Xeon seems to be 701 > [2]. In comparison, a 1GHz McKinley gets a SPECint of 810 [3]. > > --david > > [1] http://www.intel.com/support/processors/xeon/corespeeds.htm > [2] > http://www.specbench.org/cpu2000/results/res2002q1/cpu2000-20020128-01232 > .html [3] > http://www.specbench.org/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020711-01469 > .html - Got anything more real-world than SPECint type microbenchmarks? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/